| ’Tis the season for baking and cake-making. Does that mean that we
should also put up with cookie-cutter characters, follow-the-recipe
stories and undercooked plots? I would say not, and that’s why I’m
not recommending The Rogue’s Bride.
Tristan Townsend, the youngest son of a British aristocrat, has been
seeking fortune and adventure in America and Asia. When his father
and two brothers die in rather suspicious circumstances, he returns
to England as the heir to the title and the impoverished estates. At
a society ball, he is immediately taken by Lady Simone Tunbridge,
whose clever thinking, brave actions and sensible behavior save his
half-sister from an unexpected fire. Tristan uses the pretext of her
friendship with his sister to pursue a relationship.
Simone has an unusual background. Sister-in-law to one duke (featured
in Her Scandalous Marriage), she is the natural daughter of another one and a prostitute. Even though she grew up in a brothel, she was never interested enough in sex to try herself. That is, until she met Tristan. Not long after their first meeting, he initiates her into
the pleasures of the boudoir.
Both Tristan and Simone claim they don’t want anything more
permanent, but it is quite clear they do. Of course, if they actually
listened to themselves and talked to each other, the novel would have
been over after the first fifty pages. Because that just won’t do, we
get several unconnected episodes and some false obstacles thrown
their way.
For one, Tristan suspects his step-mother is behind the unexpected
deaths of the men in his family. He is convinced that she will harm
not just him but also anyone he might marry to ensure that she will
inherit everything. Hence his inconsistent behavior towards Simone.
First, he wants to use her to draw his step-mother out. Then, he
decides against doing so. Finally, he realizes his wicked step-mother
knows already and that it really doesn’t matter. He rarely explains
his actions or behavior to Simone, which of course leads to a lot of
misunderstanding and frustration (the latter mostly on the reader’s
part). To make matters worse, Tristan goes through the predictable
bachelor blues: he isn’t sure he wants to give up his footloose and
fancy free ways for Simone, even if she is so interesting, so
beautiful, so unusual, etc.
In the meantime, there is one subplot involving Tristan’s discarded
lover which is such an obvious plot mechanism it isn’t worth
mentioning and another subplot involving his younger sister. This one
goes off in at least three very different directions as if the author
had decided on a different storyline half-way through her novel and
never went back to make the necessary changes. Although the final
revelation confirms Tristan’s suspicions (and I don’t think I’m
spoiling anything by saying this), there is also another twist that
comes out of nowhere and which was probably tacked on to capture the
reader’s waning interest. It didn’t work: it only succeeded in
confirming how poorly conceived and badly edited the novel was. My
advice: don’t waste your time. Do some baking and cooking and holiday-
making instead.
--Mary Benn
|